The past few years–okay, since Obama first took office–we’ve heard a lot of talk about Socialism. But where did it come from? How did a German-based philosophy, something that has never even worked, make its way to America?
Wanting to learn more about it myself, I started researching. What follows is a very general post and barely skims the surface so I strongly encourage you to read more about it for yourself. But at this stage of the game, I believe it is vitally important to be as aware of any and everything that may be coming our way here in America.
The very first seeds of Socialism were formulated in Switzerland by Jean-Jacques Rousseau(1712-1778). Rousseau was a philosopher who helped influence the French Revolution and developed the growth of nationalism.
Following Rousseau was Karl Heinrich Marx (1818 –1883), the German philosopherwho adapted many of Rousseau’s beliefs. Marx believed capitalism was the “dictatorship of the bourgeoisie” and wanted to create a ‘workers state’—or leveled playing field, as the Liberals of 2011 like to call it. Marx believed socialism would eventually be replaced by a “stateless, classless society called pure communism.”
Socialists loved Marx’s theories so much they created the Frankfurt School. (Again, I urge everyone to read more about this “school of philosophy” and read more about it; Frankfurt has been enormously influential on American society.)
The Frankfurt Schoolwas founded in Germany and is described as a school of “neo-Marxist interdisciplinary social theory.” The school offered an alternative to capitalism and one of its biggest messages—and something that is continuing to affect the United States today—is something called ‘critical theory’.
Max Horkheimer of the Frankfurt School described critical theory as “social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only to understanding and explaining it.” They wanted to integrate all the social sciences—including economics, sociology, history, political science, anthropology, and psychology.
Basically what that means is Frankfurt School wanted to infiltrate all aspects of society and to change the way “the educated” thought about things by inserting their Marxist beliefs. And they wanted to do it by—very, very subtly–infiltrating our schools and universities and indoctrinating youth. (NOTE: This is yet another reason for all you parents out there to get more involved in your children’s public education, from elementary on! READ THEIR TEXTBOOKS and if anything smells funny, make a stance. PolitiChicks.tv will help you learn how.)
The Marxists officially began their indoctrination of American youth when WWII came about and the Frankfurt School moved to America. They continued their Marxist teachings at New York’s Columbia University. Soon, their sociology department was affiliated in universities throughout the United States.
From an article called “Intro to the Frankfurt School”:
“The Frankfurt School is the name given to the social engineers that fled Nazi Germany in order to set up their Marxist experiment in the United States. In the 1960s, while the Baby-boomers were ripe for cultural transformation, cultural Marxists such as Herbert Marcuse, Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm and Charles Reich practiced “critical theory,” “androgyny” and “cultural pessimism” in their “long march through the cultural institutions” — institutions such as the arts, cinema, theater, literature, universities, public school system, clergy and today what’s become known as the mass media. Find out how the culture you are now living, sleeping, eating and breathing in has been bastardized by cultural Marxism, also known as ‘political correctness.’”
(It’s worth noting– Dr. Benjamin Spock was a big follower of Erich Fromm. Yep, the famous baby doctor was a big-time Socialist.)
One of the most influential at the Frankfurt School—and someone whose influence is still worshipped by Liberal/Socialists today–was Herbert Marcuse and his New Left theory.
Marcuse began his teaching career in 1952, first at Columbia, then Harvard, then Brandeis University and ultimately ended up at the University of California, San Diego where he taught until he retired in the late 1970’s.
Basically, Marcuse’s New Left was all about tolerance—as long as you are only tolerating liberal/Marxist beliefs, of course.
“Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left,” Marcuse wrote.
“Surely, no government can be expected to foster its own subversion, but in a democracy such a right is vested in the people (i.e. in the majority of the people)… They would include the withdrawal of toleration of speech and assembly from groups and movements which promote aggressive policies, armament, chauvinism, discrimination on the grounds of race and religion, or which oppose the extension of public services, social security, medical care, etc.” (Marcuse’s 1965 essay “Repressive Tolerance”)
Marcuse’s New Left basically started in the 1960’s with the Hippie movement, community organizing and college campus protests. They were activists, educators and agitators who wanted to push their Socialistic agenda further than it had ever been pushed in America.
One of those very effective ‘Frankfurt School pushers’ was Saul Alinsky.
Alinsky (1909-1972) literally wrote the handbook for Liberals, “Rules for Radicals”, which continues to be used throughout social culture and the media in 2011.
Playboy magazine once called Alinsky “one of the great American leaders of the nonsocialist left.” In 1970, Time magazine wrote that “American democracy is being altered by Alinsky’s ideas” and William F. Buckley said he was “very close to being an organizational genius.”
Some very influential Alinsky followers were Ralph Nader, Cesar Chavez and Jesse Jackson. Hillary Clinton wrote her senior honors thesis about the works of Alinsky and “the effect they have on politics today.” And of course THE community organizer of 2011, Barack Obama, once wrote a Harvard paper called “After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois”.
In a nutshell, Alinsky’s Rules are summed up best by Alinsky himself: “What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. ‘The Prince’ was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. ‘Rules for Radicals’ is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away.”
The brilliant thing about Alinsky’s work—and the reason it continues to be effective today—is because the plan is to destroy their enemy from within through (very sneaky) infiltration and indoctrination. He encouraged his radicals to plant seeds of class warfare from within through community organizing.
“According to Alinsky, the organizer — especially a paid organizer from outside — must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy. This is necessary to get people to participate. An organizer has to attack apathy and disturb the prevailing patterns of complacent community life where people have simply come to accept a situation.”
In other words, “The first step in community organization is community disorganization. Through a process combining hope and resentment, the organizer tries to create a ‘mass army’ that brings in as many recruits as possible from local organizations, churches, services groups, labor unions, corner gangs, and individuals.”
By the way, the president’s first political party—back in his radical community organizing days–was with “New Party,” socialist democrats:
“The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left. It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of “fusion” failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling. But dissolving the party didn’t stop the membership, including Barack Obama, from continuing to move the Democrats leftward with spectacular success.”
So there ya go. The ‘seeds of Socialism’ began in Germany, came to New York, spread throughout our universities and helped influence everything from arts and entertainment to newspapers, film and television. And as Andrew Breitbart says, “We have now entered the first full-fledged Alinsky presidency.”
In closing, I’m adding all of the Alinsky Rules. Please study them, know them, and recognize them when you see them. They’re counting on our side not knowing their secrets—so it’s our responsibility to make sure we do.
“Alinsky provides a collection of rules to guide the process. But he emphasizes these rules must be translated into real-life tactics that are fluid and responsive to the situation at hand.”
- Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
- Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
- Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
- Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”
- Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
- Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”
- Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.
- Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”
- Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of O’Hare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the city’s reputation.
- Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”
- Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
According to Alinsky, the main job of the organizer is to bait an opponent into reacting: “The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction will be your major strength.”